If you have a good setup for testing such things, try loading, saving, and closing AndrewMacro.odt
LO claims that much of their improvements are related to large Calc documents. Might be nice to find and test their large test Calc document... Not sure what they used, however.
On 02/12/2013 07:42 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
I did some tests to see how we were doing, comparing AOO 3.4.1 on Windows against OOo 3.3.0. And since LibreOffice claims that their 4.0 release is much faster and leaner, I tested them as well, to see if we could learn anything. I just did a basic test, seeing how long it took to load a large text document, in this case the ODF 1.2 specification. I looked at memory consumed and the number of seconds to load. I loaded the document once to reduce the impact of disk caching and then repeated 5 times and took the average. All tests done on identical hardware. Memory use (KB for soffice.bin): OOo 3.3.0: 133,472 AOO 3.4.1: 129,928 LO 4.0: 165,796 Load time for ODF 1.2 specification (seconds, average of 5 loads) OOo 3.3.0: 16.0 AOO 3.4.1: 20.9 LO 4.0: 23.7 Does anyone have any other good test documents for doing performance tests of OpenOffice? Regards, -Rob
-- Andrew Pitonyak My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
