Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:14 AM, janI wrote:
read this thread twice, and see a to me well known pattern.

Indeed. A pattern that we must avoid on this list and in this project.

If you the BZ history you would have seen that I reopened the BZ after
Pedro closed it, and I gave a detailed justification why.  Pedro then
immediately re-closed it.

Nobody should forget that we have a common goal here. The project has largely improved in being welcoming, but some behaviors, even when formally correct in themselves, risk to damage our progress. For example: being confontational, repeatedly posting to endless threads, pointing fingers, quoting as if we were in a legal battle and, above all, expressing distrust of fellow committers.

The Bugzilla issue being discussed is really minor. One solution (leaving it open) is probably better, but if someone prefers to set it WONTFIX this won't affect the project at all. Just let it be. Please relax in tone, attitude and pace (many posts to this thread today). And move to more important topics.

Remember: a thread like this one drains project resources and reduces the visibility of more important topics. There are lots of things to do in the project and the mailing lists must be a welcoming place for everyone. Demotivating a committer brings more problems than mishandling a trivial Bugzilla issue does: let's simply trust that committers do what they think it's best for this project, that disagreeing is natural, that personalizing is bad.

I suggest that we leave the Bugzilla issue in whatever state it is now since trying to fix it might bring more social damage than the technical problem we have. Just move on and keep long (but respectful and right-paced) discussions for important issues.

Regards,
  Andrea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to