On 24 June 2013 17:50, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:35 AM, janI <j...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On 24 June 2013 16:16, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:26 AM, RGB ES <rgb.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > 2013/6/24 Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org>
> >> >
> >> >> A quick update.  As of last night we're now at 55,155,204 downloads
> of
> >> AOO
> >> >> 3.4.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Good!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> To put it in perspective Instagram reports that they have 100 million
> >> >> users, and Facebook thought they were worth $1 billion (US).
> >> >>
> >> >> Of course, we are free and always will be.  As Warren Buffet said,
> >> >> "Cost is what you pay; value is what you receive".  We're providing a
> >> >> lot of value.
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't think it is worth the time to do a blog post, etc.  It is not
> >> >> news any more.  But maybe at 10 million download intervals, or 75
> >> >> million or something like that, we announce more broadly?
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Related though: How 4.0 downloads will be counted? Starting from zero?
> >> > Adding them to the 3.4 numbers? Maybe both? Something like "X million
> >> > downloads of which Y millions from our latest mayor release alone"
> would
> >> be
> >> > interesting.
> >> >
> >>
> >> The data is tracked at the most fine grained level, at the level of
> >> individual files.  For example, I can tell exactly how many times the
> >> Swedish Linux 64-bit RPM AOO 3.4.1 was downloaded.  For the chart,
> >> however, I combine all 3.4.x downloads together, for full downloads
> >> (not including language packs):
> >>
> >> http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html
> >>
> >> So when 4.0 is released we have the ability, at the data level, to
> >> distinguish 4.0 downloads from 3.4.x downloads.
> >>
> >> The widget I use in the chart is the Timeplot widget from the SMILE
> >> project.  It has the ability to show multiple data series on the same
> >> plot, e.g.,:
> >>
> >> http://www.simile-widgets.org/timeplot/examples/housing/index.html
> >>
> >> So one idea might be to show the 3.4 data and the 4.0 data as
> >> individual lines on one plot, and then show the cumulative downloads
> >> (of all versions) on the other plot.  Or some variation on that.
> >>
> >> But it is a fair point that the equivalence of downloads and users
> >> breaks down once you have a major update.  The estimate for numbers of
> >> users then will need to be aligned with the greatest number of
> >> downloads of any specific version.
> >>
> >
> > Super work rob, without having dived into the details myself I hope you
> can
> > answer one question.
> >
> > Considering the download structure of 3.4.1, do you see any big backlogs
> of
> > 4.0 (point where we could assume users would download, but not supported
> by
> > 4.0) ?
> >
>
> I'm not sure I understand the question.
>
> It would be easier if you learned danish :-)

Let me try to reformulate:

You know where the bulk of the download was done (language versions,
language packs, sdk ....), looking at 4.0 would the same bulk be possible
or do we e.g. miss a part (e.g. if one language was a major download and
not supported in 4.0, it would limit the downloads).

sorry for my lack of language skills.

rgds
jan I.


> -Rob
>
> > rgds
> > jan I.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> -Rob
> >>
> >> > Regards
> >> > Ricardo
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards,
> >> >>
> >> >> -Rob
> >> >>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to