On 23/08/2013 janI wrote:
On 22 August 2013 23:51, Alexandro Colorado<j...@oooes.org> wrote:
just get a final confirmation if there a 'go' on the Wiki logo update
which
was reverted due to a regression by infra when setting the SVN.
Infra did not revert anything.
As you very well know the revert on wiki was done by me, because
a) the logos was installed in a wrong place, that made updates very
difficult
b) the standard procedure to make a backup/commit was not followed
All something that had nothing to do with consensus, but how admins work on
the vm.
I'm coming late to this part of the discussion, but this was definitely
the right thing to do. We care about a professional-level maintenance of
our Infrastructure (and actually Apache Infra demands and enforces it).
Everyone can make mistakes, but when we can correct them we must do so.
And this is the "technical" part.
I respects these concerns and feel reel consensus is
much more important than a technicality, even if it takes 400+ hours.
As vm-admin, I will not install a new logo and/or change html/css before I
see a broad acceptance. Other vm-admins might feel different.
And now coming to the "community" part: this was very right too. An
administrator must check consensus before doing changes. And consensus
reaching may well take weeks (the larger and simpler the issue -and this
is "large" since it affects several sites and "simple" since everybody
can have a say- the longer the discussion).
The important thing is that eventually we get things done! Hagar
restarted the constructive discussion at
http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=63523 recently
and I hope we can move forward there.
Regards,
Andrea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
