Am 02/13/2014 11:13 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 02/13/2014 10:02 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Hi,
Am 11.02.2014 um 00:55 schrieb "Marcus (OOo)"<marcus.m...@wtnet.de>:
Am 02/10/2014 10:22 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Hi,
Am 10.02.2014 um 21:46 schrieb "Marcus (OOo)"<marcus.m...@wtnet.de>:
Am 02/10/2014 08:53 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Marcus (OOo)<marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
wrote:
Am 01/30/2014 10:52 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 01/30/2014 08:38 AM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Hi Markus,
below you find the output of my iMac running Mac OS X 10.7
thanks for the 10.7 data. At least here I can do some scripting
changes.
From my point of view it should be assured that Mac users
running Mac
OS X 10.6 or earlier are _not_ directed to a download of AOO 4.1.
Instead they should be directed to AOO 4.0.1 together with a
note saying
that AOO 4.1 needs Mac OS X version 10.7 or later.
This depends on when 4.0.1 will be available in the archive. So,
let's
see what will be possible.
Nevetheless, as I don't know if older and newer browsers than 10.7
identifying itself in the same way, I need more data.
@Oliver: Can you help me here, too?
@Oliver and all Mac users:
I've finished a first test. Please have a look:
http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/index.html
After "downgrading" my iMac to 10.6 [1] I got
Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 for *MacOS X (10.6 or older)* is not
available.
Please choose another platform build from the alternative download
webpage.<http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/>
It seems the order to present the correct text and link inside the
green box was not correct. Is it now better?
Previously, I did not follow the link and thus, I did not notice
that itnwas the intended one.
Text looks better, but the link target would confuse unexperienced
user from my point of view - there too much clicks needed to get to
the corresponding directory containing the packages and then there
are too much files with similar names.
Better would be a direct link to the the installation package of the
4.0.1 which would be also available at sourceforge.net as I assume.
When we can be sure that the previous versions will remain longer on
Sourceforge then OK.
I've implemented a special behaviour for old Mac builds to provide
assembled download URLs, so I hope I've covered that part. Please
test - and also the linked checksum files.
In my special downgraded OS X the test is ok.
Thats good to see.
Just one minor issue:
The tooltip for the Release Notes link talks about 4.1.0. The link
goes correctly to the 4.0.1 Release Notes, only the tooltip is wrong.
In my normal OS X the test is ok, except the link to the Release Notes.
Yes, this was hardcoded. Now exchanged with a variable, depending on the
respective version.
BTW:
Cross the fingers that I'll get access to a 10.5.x machine after the
weekend.
I got the chance to test on a MacBook with 10.5.7 and it worked like I
wanted to see it.
So, we have confirmed that:
- users with 10.5 *) and 10.6 are pointed to AOO 4.0.1
- users with 10.7 and newer are pointed to AOO 4.1.0
*) I think we can forget to test 10.4 and older as it's unlikely that we
get the chance. However, I expect that these versions get identied the
same way, so I think these will be covered, too.
Feature done and verified. :-)
Marcus
It would be great, if it could be added that 4.0.1 is available
for Mac OS
X 10.6 or older incl. corresponding link.
Yes, that was intended.
[1] changing key "ProductVersion" in
/System/Library/CoreServices/SystemVersion.plist
Interesting feature. :-)
If you see problems, please tell me the data from the analyze
webpage:
http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html
Marcus
BTW:
I've tested with 10.6 data (as far as I can do this without a Mac
;-) ).
Older versions to recognize are derived from 10.6 but may not
work. So,
please test also with other old versions.
Thanks in advance
Marcus
On 28.01.2014 23:24, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 12/20/2013 02:47 PM, schrieb Herbert Duerr:
On 19.12.2013 17:58, jan i wrote:
On 19 December 2013 17:29, Herbert Duerr<hdu_...@alice.de>
wrote:
The new Mac port looks quite good. I uploaded a current
version to my
page
[1]. Jürgen already mentioned it will only work for OSX
10.7 and up.
It is
based on todays trunk, which already contains a lot of
fixes and
enhancements compared to our latest release. For details
you can
have a
look at our progress tracking page [2].
[1] http://people.apache.org/~hdu/
[2] http://people.apache.org/~hdu/izlist9.htm
In the early days of next year I plan to update our trunk
so the new
port
becomes active. To build it yourself you'll need XCode4
then. XCode4
comes
with the 10.7 SDK.
+1 the wiki "build instructions" should also be updated.
+1
Do we also need to update information on the download page (e.g.
that we
only support OSX 10.7 and up) ?
As Jürgen already mentioned the installation files are already
protected. We should also update the release notes, etc.
If it is possible to know the OS version from e.g. the
browser's User
Agent then we should update the download page too. Maybe we
already
have
such a mechanism. Does anyone happen to have OSX 10.3 or
earlier? What
happens when you go to the OpenOffice download page?
Good point.
Can someone help me and test the download webpage with
different OSX
versions? I need the user agent text fromthe used browsers
(Firefox and
Safari).
Or better, please use this webpage and send me the raw data
from the
table:
http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html
If there is a way to recognize the differences, then I can build
something around the scripting.
Otherwise I would suggest a general hint text when OSX in
general was
detected.
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
