On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 1:02 PM, jonathon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 23/12/14 23:00, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > > Here is a typical example of confusion about this product, > > < > https://www.marshut.net/pyzxp/aoo-for-android-not-worth-the-download.html > >. > > Notice "Apache's Open Office for Android." And folks speak of AOO for > > Android as if it is the AOO known to us. > > That review was written two years ago, when Android OpenOffice was > littered with Apache branding. Even looking at the small print, it was > hard to discover that it wasn't an official Apache Foundation port. > > I'll grant that the presence of advertising should have tipped off that > it wasn't an official Apache Foundation port, but back then, it was so > unobtrusive that it would not have been noticed. > > jonathon > >
