I think the problem is that at least one purchaser of their ads-free option complained to users @oo.a.o and was convinced that it was ours to support and to fix the crashers he experienced.
It might be good to consult with the trademarks folks about what constitutes confusion and how we would request others to avoid causing it. Consider <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOO>. I don't know what contributed to the confusion for that user. I'm not in a position to install it on any device I have in order to see what the issues might be with the app itself and how it is presented. I'll ask the particular user what led him to users @oo.a.o. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 13:37 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Deflecting the Attack of the Clones Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > However, there are now apparent forks of AOO, such as AndrOpen Office > (boldly dubbed "AOO" and which seems to confuse some folks even > though it is described as a fork and as not associated with the project). We are in good relationship with the author. The current branding and wording of "AndrOpen Office" were approved by the OpenOffice PMC. If any changes are needed, feel free to suggest them. It is an unofficial port, but it is also as close as possible to OpenOffice. Regards, Andrea. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
