On Tuesday, December 30, 2014, Andrea Pescetti <[email protected]> wrote:
> jan i wrote: > >> any progress in the discussion, would be nice to get a decidion so we can >> start making the release. >> > > I believe we made progress on everything that is under our control. Maybe > it's good that I repeat the information here so that we can track it better. > > Open issues were: > 1) Decide on making 4.1.1.1, 4.1.2, whatever. This is solved, we are going > to make a new release and call it 4.1.2. > 2) Fix access to certificate for signing. Still waiting for Infra, but I > can't blame them. > 3) Decide what to include. I opened a dedicated discussion yesterday, with > an explicit list of about 20 bugs to consider. > 4) Add 4.1.2 to Bugzilla. We need a Bugzilla admin to do it, asked > yesterday. we also need 5) discuss do we need a release candidate or do we vote on the real thing. 6) get confirmation from jürgen that he has time now to this "double" release 6a) check if he can do all platforms or alternatively find out how to do the rest 7) make sure henkp will help with the mirrors again, last time he was less than pleased due to the 1week window of regular work. 8) prepare release notes etc. > > As for the source code, we don't even need a new branch (even though I > would be for creating it); as you see at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ > openoffice/branches/ for 4.1.1 we reused the "AOO410" branch. I am aware of that, personally I dont like it, because we loose track of what was released, but I will leave that to the release manager. rgds jan i > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
