My concern is that with the proposal the GUI is going away. On Mar 26, 2015, at 12:09 AM, jan i wrote:
> Hi All > > In the ongoing discussion (apache wide) Infra has now made a FAQ, which is > worth reading. > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/CMS+Decommissioning+RFC+-+Frequently+Asked+Questions > > Remark, due to some disussions, Infra made this disclaimer: > > "This is ONLY a request for commentary from the community on a proposal by > Infra to work towards decommissioning the CMS. It is NOT an express > statement by the infra group that we will be taking any specific action(s). > We seek input from the community on this proposal so that we can make more > informed decisions on the future direction of CMS support, whether that be > via replacement, via resources applied to bring the existing CMS to > acceptable support standards, or some other option TBD." > > If the CMS were to be decommissioned in the way currently suggested, we > would have a couple of challenges: > - Find a replacement online edtitor for our translators (who are also > committers) > - Find a way to keep the templates active in pure HTML > - Decide not to use markdown but only html (BAD for our translators). > > Or alternatively (something that currently seems less work): > - Get a VM, install CMS and run it for us. > > rgds > jan I. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
