Excuse me I meant NO objections. Sorry.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 5, 2015, at 8:04 AM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> I see no objections to the wording.
> 
> If we have funded the leaflet before then I have objections. If not and this 
> is permitted then I am for LAZY CONSENSUS.
> 
> That covers 2 and 3.
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Sep 5, 2015, at 3:49 AM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>>> Great!! My mistake.  Go for it: [PROPOSE], [DISCUSS], whatever.
>> 
>> Being realistic, this won't help much at this stage. Every message where we 
>> politely ask each other to start a proper discussion is a waste of time 
>> given the very close deadlines.
>> 
>> Note that I am not involved with the Plugfest at all and I happened to bring 
>> the issue here just because of someone's outdated address book, but still 
>> I'd like that we get done what we can get done.
>> 
>> Out of the three issues I originally mentioned:
>> 1) Someone from OpenOffice attending
>> 2) Updates for the leaflet
>> 3) Financial support for the leaflet
>> the one that we can get done for sure is 2.
>> 
>> For 1) we have Louis' availability but by the time everything is approved it 
>> will be unrealistic that he can still arrange an intercontinental flight 
>> (which is a pity since we started discussing the Plugfest attendance three 
>> months ago, we should really learn from this).
>> 
>> For 3) while I do see some consensus on contributing the 100 GBP = ~135 EUR 
>> = ~150 USD for printing the English leaflet, my worry is that we can't get 
>> anything decided by the deadline (Tuesday 8 September afternoon European 
>> time).
>> 
>> So, coming to item 2: I'm still hopeful we can provide up-to-date data about 
>> OpenOffice. You can find below what is needed, what is currently there and 
>> what I propose we send them (which I will have to do on Tuesday morning 
>> European time; if someone else takes care of it I'll be happier).
>> 
>> NEEDED           CURRENT                      PROPOSED
>> Software (name)  Apache Open Office           Apache OpenOffice
>> License          Open Source                  Open Source (ALv2)
>> Formats          All                          (no changes) [1]
>> Platforms        (empty)                      Windows, OS X, Linux, 
>> third-party ports to Android, FreeBSD, OS/2
>> Support          Community                    (no changes) [2]
>> Link             http://www.openoffice.org/   (no changes)
>> Notes            (empty)                      (empty)
>> 
>> [1]: Formats are the ODF file extensions, not the non-ODF file types.
>> [2]: Here the choice is between Community and Commercial.
>> 
>> Can we at least agree on this basic information for the "Applications" 
>> sections, which is what they need most?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Andrea.
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to