On 10/25/2015 04:24 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> Ok, I am changing my vote to: >> [0] Abstain > > Thanks for your understanding. > >> I suppose since the file is generated, unused, and was present in >> previous >> releases, it shouldn't stop this release. ... >> since the file is a generated file and not a source file, that may >> not >> apply? > > If this had been caught early in the process, we would still have > fixed in RC3 since it is trivial to do so. At this point, I opened > an issue > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126605 > so that we ensure that this doesn't happen again. > >> Ok, good that we use CentOS 5 for binaries. My concern is that if it >> doesn't build on 32-bit Xubuntu, it won't build on 32-bit Ubuntu >> either, as >> they are very similar. But I'll check that at some stage. Since >> most people >> don't run Linux, and most Linux users won't be building from >> source, and of >> those building not all will be on 32-bit (X)ubuntu, and we can >> document the >> workaround, I guess it's ok. > > Thanks, issue and workaround noted in > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.2+Release+Notes > > > Regards, > Andrea.
Just a short FYI. I got curious about this especially in light of the fact that the Linux-32 SNAPSHOT has been non-functioning for about a month and I hadn't noticed that. I downloaded the tarball and built on my CentOS 6.7 32 bit setup and all is well. I should have done this to begin with I guess. :/ The output from the last good Linux-32 SNAPSHOT build (Sept. 21) can be found at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-snapshot -- -------------------------------------------- MzK “The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.” --Lao Tzu --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
