Just to be clear.
I follow by all passionate argumentation, my vote goes to whatever Jim and 
Matthias decide. They do releases, and they earned the most kudos on that.
I am in whatever makes them happy!
I like meritocracy! Even if that leaves me rather at the edge in a lot of 
topics.

All the best
Peter

Am 26. Oktober 2017 00:18:25 MESZ schrieb Marcus <marcus.m...@wtnet.de>:
>Am 24.10.2017 um 22:25 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>> I'm starting a short series of occasional posts to capture the
>current 
>> collective state of mind on the next release. I'll float them here
>for 
>> refinement or lazy consensus, and then we may want to reuse this text
>in 
>> wiki or blog posts to avoid repeating the same concepts over and
>over.
>> 
>> Let's start with branches.
>> 
>> We all wish 4.1.4 to be the last 4.1.x release.
>> 
>> We currently have an AOO415 branch at 
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO415/ ; this
>branch 
>> is a copy of AOO414 (that resulted in OpenOffice 4.1.4). The AOO415 
>> branch will result in a release ONLY if we have some important bug
>fixes 
>> to release and trunk is not ready yet. No new features, even small 
>> enhancements, are added to it. No commits to AOO415 happen without 
>> appropriate mailing list discussions (dev or security, depending on
>cases).
>> 
>> Trunk is where all development happens. It will be branched for a new
>
>> release (like, an AOO420 branch - name still provisional) when the
>code 
>> is mature: beta or even RC. Until then, we simply keep working on
>trunk 
>> as we are doing now.
>> 
>> In case we need to commit to a branch, any changes are still
>committed 
>> to trunk first and then merged to branches using SVN merge in all 
>> situations when this is possible (i.e., when there are no merge 
>> conflicts). The mergeinfo for AOO414 and AOO415 isn't clear, so we'll
>
>> have to make sure that trunk contains all fixes done there (or 
>> equivalent in case of conflicts) and, done that, we commit to AOO415 
>> only if:
>> 1. The fix is important and agreed upon on the relevant list
>> 2. The commit is done with "svn merge" starting from a trunk commit
>> 
>> This will ensure that we can shift the focus to trunk while still 
>> keeping a branch that remains ready for a quick release if needed. If
>we 
>> are never in this situation, the next release will be from the
>current 
>> trunk and AOO415 will never result in a release.
>
>"First trunk, then the branch(es)" is not new. I think we are working 
>already in this way. But just to make it clear.
>
>so, to keep it short:
>I like the proposal.
>
>Marcus
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to