Am 14.12.2017 um 09:21 schrieb Peter kovacs:
It is not about what we agree upon.
This is a public vote. And whoever gives a vote is deciding now.
Maybe this is an effect from trolling against us, but I do not think there is
space for public weakness or naivete. (And I try not do do both...)
I thought about putting my preferences into my description and decided against
it because it would weaken the project.
I was really thankful on Andrea's words. Which are nicely written, but I
thought again it would be a weakness to show the thankfullnes so I stoped to
write the comment and my vote.
Sorry if I over complicate things.
I really do not mind whoever gets the job. We have all much to do and only
little time.
So I am now again late for work :(
I really hate the "Libre Office troll feedback loop"!
now I'm confused. Why is Libre Office influencing this vote? I don't see
any connections.
Marcus
Am 14. Dezember 2017 03:11:32 MEZ schrieb Carl Marcum <cmar...@apache.org>:
On 12/13/2017 07:08 PM, Peter kovacs wrote:
I am confused. There was no proper " I do not want to candidate
anymore mail."
But maybe my English is not good enough.
A one candidate vote is something completely different as between 2+
candidates. Such a step should be well thought of if this is really the
right step.
Also I would like to know how do you count votes for Carl if he has
resigned, which I doubt.
Not so happy
peter
<snip>
Hi Peter,
I can still be in and prefer you become Chair this time.
If I misunderstood your desire to be Chair I apologize.
I stepped up to make sure we had a new chair even though my workload is
very high right now.
I thought you had changed your mind about waiting until next year.
If you do not want it, My offer still stands and I'll stand in.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
