Thanks for this Peter. Let’s just focus on what we can control!

Best Regards,
Dave

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 15, 2017, at 1:19 AM, Peter kovacs <pe...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> I am sorry for the confusion I am causing.
> Sometimes I get stuck in topics, and overrated them due to an inner loop of 
> focus.
> In this case it were to not give attackspace to possible trolls. That's why I 
> called it Libre Office troll feedback loop. Libre does only show up because 
> they use Libre for stumping on us.
> There is no one involved except me and my other 1000 versions of myself. ;)
> I hate when this happens because I tend to do stupid things. And I need time 
> to clear such loops up.
> 
> In the end it is important that someone does  the chair job and Carl or 
> myself will need to make time for it.
> We can spend the time well for other things.
> I don't have to do this but will if selected.
> I think same goes for Carl.
> That's all I think is important to know.
> 
> I am really sorry.
> 
> Am 14. Dezember 2017 20:38:36 MEZ schrieb Marcus <marcus.m...@wtnet.de>:
>>> Am 14.12.2017 um 09:21 schrieb Peter kovacs:
>>> It is not about what we agree upon.
>>> This is a public vote. And whoever gives a vote is deciding now.
>>> 
>>> Maybe this is an effect from trolling against us, but I do not think
>> there is space for public weakness or naivete. (And I try not do do
>> both...)
>>> I thought about putting my preferences into my description and
>> decided against it because it would weaken the project.
>>> I was really thankful on Andrea's words. Which are nicely written,
>> but I thought again it would be a weakness to show the thankfullnes so
>> I stoped to write the comment and my vote.
>>> 
>>> Sorry if I over complicate things.
>>> I really do not mind whoever gets the job. We have all much to do and
>> only little time.
>>> 
>>> So I am now again late for work :(
>>> I really hate the "Libre Office troll feedback loop"!
>> 
>> now I'm confused. Why is Libre Office influencing this vote? I don't
>> see 
>> any connections.
>> 
>> Marcus
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 14. Dezember 2017 03:11:32 MEZ schrieb Carl Marcum
>> <cmar...@apache.org>:
>>>> On 12/13/2017 07:08 PM, Peter kovacs wrote:
>>>>> I am confused. There was no proper " I do not want to candidate
>>>> anymore mail."
>>>>> But maybe my English is not good enough.
>>>>> 
>>>>> A one candidate vote is something completely different as between
>> 2+
>>>> candidates. Such a step should be well thought of if this is really
>> the
>>>> right step.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Also I would like to know how do you count votes for Carl if he has
>>>> resigned, which I doubt.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Not so happy
>>>>> peter
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> <snip>
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>> 
>>>> I can still be in and prefer you become Chair this time.
>>>> 
>>>> If I misunderstood your desire to be Chair I apologize.
>>>> 
>>>> I stepped up to make sure we had a new chair even though my workload
>> is
>>>> 
>>>> very high right now.
>>>> 
>>>> I thought you had changed your mind about waiting until next year.
>>>> 
>>>> If you do not want it, My offer still stands and I'll stand in.
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to