On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 4/2/2018 6:41 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Keith N. McKenna < > keith.mcke...@comcast.net> > > wrote: > > > >> On 3/30/2018 3:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >>> I've committed changes to the QA area complete with the "index" > >> capability > >>> of the new test case area. I'll be working on additional changes to the > >> QA > >>> area over the next few days before a general announcement to QA. > >>> > >>> NOTE: the staging web site -- http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/ -- > >> allows > >>> for +Indexes automatically so displays can be misleading in that > >>> environment. Our default setup for -- http://www.openoffice.org/ -- > does > >>> not. > >>> > >>> We should probably request that infra setup both these servers the > same. > >>> > >>> > >> Kay; > >> > >> Just tried to check out ooo-site repo in preparation for completing the > >> download of all the Impress test cases and ran into a problem. You have > >> a number of files that include an * in the filename. This is no-no on > >> windows and causes a corrupt working copy on Windows that can not be > >> used. Can you update the ooo-site repo and replace those 1/2 dozen or so > >> files with * in the names so that I can check out a new working copy? > >> > > > > Yes, I will do that. > Thanks Kay. A closer look at the repo shows somewhere around 2 dozen > files that have * in the file name. > > > > > > > > >> > >> Also a process question. Why did you chose to put all the tests in a > >> single directory rather than breaking it down by application the way > >> they were on the testlink site? > > > > > > An oversight on my part, but as I got into this, I did see there was a > LOT > > of overlap, with the former QA folks establishing categories for some > very > > specific areas. We can probably restructure this new area just based on > > file names and move things around. I discovered on the original TestLink > > site that there were MANY fine-grained categorizations that we probably > > don't need. > > > > > > > > > >> The process engineer in me says that it > >> would be cleaner to do it by application so that a volunteer working on > >> Writer doesn't have to wade through tests that do not apply to them to > >> find the Writer specific ones. > >> > > > > I thought perhaps the file names themselves would suffice for > determining > > categories. In any case, please feel free to organize this area further. > I > > would think subareas for Wrtier, Calc, Impress, Database, Drawing would > be > > enough -- or not. > > Once I get a clean checkout of the repo I will take a closer look at > possibilities for restructuring it a bit. > OK, I think the filenames are fixed now. Bad commit the first time I guess. Great if you could help with the restructuring. Please keep in mind that this is not ALL the TestLink files. I need to see what we're missing and want to have at this point. > > Regards > Keith > > > > > > > >> > >> Regards > >> Keith > > > > > >> > >> > > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Less is MORE."
