Release, as in GA, or release as in Beta? > On Feb 15, 2019, at 4:55 AM, Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> wrote: > > Bug 125129 looks like a wild goose chase and requires considerable > understanding of the framework layer, but I'll try continue when I have > time. > > My own release checklist would include: > 1. Library audit. > 1.1 Did we lose or gain any public symbols in our libraries since the > 4.1.0? Gbuild requires explicit export instead of exporting everything and > then possibly controlling visibility with a .map file, so it's very > possible. > 1.2 Did ELF symbol versions on *nix platforms change? The older gbuild > modules probably did, as I didn't understand the meaning of .map files back > then. > 1.3 Are the same libraries with the same names available in both 4.1.0 and > 4.2.0? > 2. Base: > 2.1 Complete the Java SDBC driver framework, used by both the new SDBC-JDBC > bridge and the Postgres SDBC driver. > 2.2 Audit the new SDBC-JDBC bridge in Java against the old C++ one, fix any > differences. > 2.3 Complete the Postgres SDBC driver; still needs views, users, groups, > etc. > 2.4 Complete the integration of the Postgres SDBC driver into the Base UI > forms (like MySQL already is). > 3. Crashreporter > 3.1 Get it working again. > 3.2 Bug reported in UI form (instead of submitted to some now obsolete > server), which can be copied/pasted or attached to Bugzilla. > 4. Testing > 4.1 Run all available tests (unit tests, smoketest, module integration > tests, bvt, fvt, etc.) against 4.1.0 and 4.2.0, find and fix any > regressions. > > Damjan > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 1:25 AM Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> > wrote: > >> Hi Jim, >> >> IMO, the situation hasn't changed so much. >> >> We should at least fix issue 125129 [1] before we release a (public) >> beta. I have seen that Damjan is investigating... >> >> Then we need time to inform translators on l10n@ before we can export >> the latest translations from Pootle. >> At the moment most of them are at 98% for the UI but the SDF files still >> need to be updated in source. >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >> [1] https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125129 >> >> >> Am 14.02.19 um 17:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Time for another ping... what does everyone think? Time? >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >>> >> >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
