On 29.07.19 17:18, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Am 29.07.19 um 00:39 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >> A different suggestion we use the git commit count. The command is: >> >> |git rev-list --all --count It will deliver something that looks similar >> to the svn number we already use. All the Best Peter | > How would such a simple count point to a specific commit/revision? > I checked this,. In theory it should but there are a lots of option how to count in git.
Which makes this not so optimal as on first glance. But it seems a lot of people use it to stick to a revision number. So there seems to be only 2 true options for referencing the commit: 1) We use the short hash. 2) We tag releases automatically at checkin. Tbh I would rather use the short hash. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
