(Bumping up th topic again) Hi all,
One thing I noticed while building with AdoptOpenJDK are numerous warnings regarding Javadoc. Maybe someone with some understanding can have a look at it? Otherwise, I have no problems when using AOO on a daily base, even with different JREs configured. Regards, Matthias Am 01.10.19 um 20:39 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Marcus, > > Am 01.10.19 um 20:20 schrieb Marcus: >> Am 01.10.19 um 10:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Am 01.10.19 um 01:23 schrieb Marcus: >>>> Am 30.09.19 um 22:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>> Am 30.09.19 um 22:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >>>>>> We had constant 7 votes on 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 release. However only 3 >>>>>> volunteers voted in both releases. >>>>>> These numbers are low in general. Maybe we need to organize test >>>>>> phases in order to raize the numbers. This will still not raise test >>>>>> attendance for a single feature. >>>>>> >>>>>> How about we schedule a test release every quarter? These releases >>>>>> do not necessary lead to a release and are announced as unstable. >>>>>> But it would give people a better time frame to plan and we can >>>>>> advertise for tester. >>>>> I build new versions about every second week. >>>>> For sure, people are downloading these builds and use them on a daily >>>>> base. Still no feedback! >>>>> >>>>> The problem isn't about the builds... >>>> to make it a bit more comfortable for you: What about to build only >>>> when it is worth it (e.g., after some commits or bigger/important >>>> commits and not with a fixed time schedule? >>> I am not uncomfortable with building AOO. In fact I build even more >>> often to test my changes before I commit. >>> I only upload once a week or two. ;-) >>> >>> And don't forget that we have no working buildbots anymore! >> sure, I just want to show you a way to reduce your builds. Especially >> when the commit rate is very low at the moment. > I do only build (for my personal use) when I did a commit. This way I > can monitor if something is broken. > Constant QA is something missing from this project for way too long... > > Matthias > >> Marcus >> >> >> >>>>>> Am 30. September 2019 21:13:52 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel >>>>>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>: >>>>>>> Hi Dave, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 30.09.19 um 18:53 schrieb Dave Fisher: >>>>>>>> Hi Matthias, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think that it is likely people were focused on 4.1.7 testing. >>>>>>> Where have all these people been when we voted for release? ;-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My personal opinion is that if switching does not require users to >>>>>>> switch and they can use the Oracle JRE if that is what they have >>>>>>> then >>>>>>> the change make sense. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The user is still free to choose whatever JRE he/she wants (and is >>>>>>> detected by AOO). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I build with AdoptOpenJDK for some weeks now [1] and have found no >>>>>>> problems. But that *really* needs more testing... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Dave >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sep 30, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Matthias Seidel >>>>>>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: >>>>>>>>> No feedback=No interest? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe I should stop providing test builds. >>>>>>>>> That would save me a lot of my spare time... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Am 05.09.19 um 12:58 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>>>>>>> Hi Keith, all, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Did you have time to test? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Feedback is always welcome... ;-) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am 01.09.19 um 18:23 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Am 31.08.19 um 18:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Keith, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Am 31.08.19 um 15:37 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/31/2019 4:23 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> At the moment I am doing my test builds (trunk and 42X) for >>>>>>> Windows with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the latest Oracle JDK (8u221). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am still able to download, but Oracle changed its >>>>>>>>>>>>>> licensing. >>>>>>> I am not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a lawyer and would prefer to move away from it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Damjan recently introduced some patches, so AOO can now work >>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> AdoptOpenJDK. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is available in 32 bit, which is still needed for Windows >>>>>>> [1]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am just doing a build for AOO 4.2.0 with AdaptOpenJDK >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (8u222) >>>>>>> and it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> looks good so far... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://adoptopenjdk.net/releases.html?variant=openjdk8&jvmVariant=hotspot#x32_win >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mathias; >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This sounds like it has great potential as it appears to gives >>>>>>> us a >>>>>>>>>>>>> potential path beyond version 8 as a cursory reading of the >>>>>>> AdoptOpenJDK >>>>>>>>>>>>> web site shows that it supports version 11 and 12 for both >>>>>>>>>>>>> both >>>>>>> Windows >>>>>>>>>>>>> 32 and 64 bit systems. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I look forward to testing your new version 4.2.0 build with >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> AdoptOpenJDK. >>>>>>>>>>>> You will find them at the usual place: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> They should be up tomorrow. >>>>>>>>>>> Builds are online! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please test, especially everything related to Java. ;-) >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
