> On Jun 2, 2021, at 11:58 AM, Marcus <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:
>
> Am 02.06.21 um 00:07 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> On 01.06.21 21:57, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>>>>> I would not go for file://. Can we go for a pattern derivated from
>>>>> file://path/document.ods#anchor ?
>>> I am not sure I understand your question, Peter.
>>>
>> I am suggesting not to trust file:// in general, but the anchored URL,
>
> yes, the securty report is talking about nin-http(s) links, And "ile" is not
> http. There we have to treat this as insecure.
>
>> maybe file://*#anchor if you like.
>> But maybe I got this URL wrong.
>
> Hm, I don't see how an anchor makes the document more secure. ;-)
We need to know if the file:// is already open.
>
> Marcus
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
