Hi Marcus, Am 27.05.21 um 19:10 schrieb Marcus: > Am 27.05.21 um 16:18 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 27.05.21 um 16:07 schrieb Dave Fisher: >>> IMO there are a couple more issues like hyperlink protocols to >>> always allow to look into before 4.1.11 builds. So, if you are >>> looking to build right now then 4.2.0dev. >> >> Yes, 4.2.0-Dev3 would simply be an official "snapshot" of what we have >> in branch AOO42X. >> >> 4.1.11 needs a lot more work to be released. >> >>> Maybe a thread on the release blockers for 4.2.0? >> >> +1 > > please not as mails. IMHO this will end in a total mess and nobody is > able to keep the overview. ;-) Good idea! > > Better to create a Confluence page, start with the list of opened and > targeted issues [1]. Then we can discuss which issues we can fix for > 4.2.0.
I would simply start with the list of Release Blockers: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&f1=flagtypes.name&list_id=248770&o1=substring&order=changeddate%20DESC%2Cbug_id%20DESC&query_based_on=4.2.0_blocker_requested%2B&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&resolution=FIXED&v1=4.2.0_release_blocker Matthias > > [1] > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&resolution=---&target_milestone=4.2.0 > > Marcus > > > >>>> On May 27, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Matthias Seidel >>>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: >>>>> Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>>>>> On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel >>>>>>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: >>>>>> Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>>>>>> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori >>>>>>>> <ard...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish >>>>>>>> before 4.2.0? >>>>>>>> Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to >>>>>>>> 4.1.99 ! ;-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best >>>>>>> solution, but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on >>>>>>> 4.1.X at the expense of 4.2.X. >>>>>> We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0. >>>>>> But the remaining ones are untouched for long time. >>>>>> >>>>>> What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got >>>>>> urgent... >>>>>> >>>>> So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3? >>>> I don't see a problem to do both? > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
