Dear Jorg, I am a loyal user of WPS and Microsoft Office, not Open Office.
The reason why I suggested an Open Office Lite edition is I am tired of the new versions of WPS and Microsoft that have little improvement over the previous ones. I am suggesting this for the better common good of office users, not because I have the need to use it. I will become a loyal fan of Oo Lite if it meets the quality requirement for research paper quality writing, but not for now. China already has a free replacement of Microsoft Office, which is WPS. The software also has a Linux Edition. People really have no urge to use Oo Lite. WPS is currently No. 1 on Chinese market. I think European market would be a good place for Oo Lite. I am not "honestly" saying I want an Oo Lite Edition because I don't know what "I" represents for at this moment. I have trouble with my social and family ties that the other side refuse to listen or accept a resolution in a legal and enforcible manner. I find I am incapable to resolve anything related to more than 1 person that involves "I". So I go for the word "future" instead of "I". In future, we will see a better and different world, even though I might not live to that day. 获取 Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> ________________________________ From: Jörg Schmidt <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de> Sent: Sunday, September 5, 2021 3:26:04 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org <dev@openoffice.apache.org> Subject: RE: OpenOffice needs better UI > -----Original Message----- > From: Hao Wang [mailto:hao...@live.com] > Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2021 6:41 AM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: OpenOffice needs better UI > Should we create an Oo Lite edition that is small in size and > lightweighted as discussed in the messages ? This is actually > how WPS resurrected on the Chinese market. I think Oo Lite > could also challenge Microsoft in Europe as well. BTW, a > Windows edition of Oo Lite would also be a great threat to Microsoft. Where is the problem to honestly say: an "Oo Lite edition" would please me? That would be a position I could share. What I can't share is the kind of argumentation that tries to convince us of unrealistic chances of success for AOO, only with the obvious interest of wanting to push through an "Oo Lite Edition" in this way. A little provocatively: Where are the Chinese developers who are interested in implementing a "Oo Lite edition"? _If_ it were realistic that a "Oo Lite edition" would be so overly successful in China, then I'm pretty sure Chinese developers would realize that and be willing to support AOO. But such questions are answered automatically in a meritocratic project, because if there are enough people who believe in the success of a specific change in the program, then (not necessarily, but very likely) people will be found who will implement this change in practice. Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
