Hi Marcus and All,
On 4/21/22 4:15 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 21.04.22 um 14:57 schrieb Carl Marcum:
Does anyone know what the list_id parameter is for in the URL after a
search?
[...]
I did a quick search with Google (bugzilla url list_id) and found this
as first hit:
https://support-bugzilla.mozilla.narkive.com/jXnwYmle/purpose-of-list-id-url-parameter
HTH
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
So it seems the list_id may be a saved result, meaning if something
happens to an issue that would change the search result list it would
not be updated when using the list_id in a URL.
You have to do a new search or not include the list_id in the URL to get
the current results.
At least that is the way I'm understanding it.
Now my questions is:
When we provide a URL like this in a release blog post or announcement
should we do a new search and use the list_id in the URL so we have a
snapshot in time or
not include it so each user gets an up-to-date result?
For example, if an issue is changed from fixed to reopened, do we want
that issue to appear in the list after that or not?
It might be easier on the database if we use the list_id at release time
so everyone that follows the link isn't creating a new entry as long as
we're okay with the snapshot in time list.
Thanks,
Carl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
