Sorry for the confusion: I agree that now is not the right time.
> On Sep 2, 2026, at 4:14 PM, Pedro Lino via dev <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
>> On 09/02/2026 7:46 PM WEST Jim Jagielski <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> I would agree.
>
> With whom? With Pedro Giffuni to raise Java to 11 or with Peter that this is
> not the right time?
>
> I tend to agree with Peter that changing "everything all at once" doesn't
> seem like a good idea. Maybe Java can be updated at a later stage?
>
> All the best,
> Pedro (Lino)
>
>>> On Sep 2, 2026, at 2:00 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 02.09.2026 um 19:27 schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni via dev:
>>>> Hello;
>>>> I have this idea that OpenOffice should be leaner so I have a patch for
>>>> MediaWiki that replaces a bunch of old Java dependencies with JVM
>>>> functionality.
>>>> commons-httpclient --> java.net.http.HttpClientcommons-codec -->
>>>> java.util.Base64 / HexFormatcommons-logging --> java.util.logging / AOO
>>>> loggingcommons-lang3 --> JDK equivalents
>>>> The downside: we will now require Java 11+. I think nowadays this is a
>>>> pretty reasonable requirement though. Any comments?
>>>
>>> I dont feel comfortable with this proposal. I think this not the right time.
>>>
>>>> Pedro.
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jim
>> "This is an outrage!"
>> Tony Harrison
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
--
Jim
"This is an outrage!"
Tony Harrison
