Sorry... Your reply didn't sound like a proposal but rather a command, but I 
now understand that that was not your intent. I am still a firm believer that 
it is the _intent_ that matters and, as Archimedes in `The Once And Future 
King` says:

"...I bitterly regret that I should have been so petty as to take offense where 
none was intended."

> On Oct 19, 2026, at 3:58 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 19.10.2026 um 21:41 schrieb [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>:
>> 
>> Am 19.10.2026 um 21:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> The search named 5.0.0 OpenIssues does not exist.
>>> 
>>> I've got a smashing idea... let's pick a method that works for 
>>> _everyone_... you know, let's work as a _team_ and _compromise_ and 
>>> universally agree to a method.
>> Are you saying that you are not able to handle Bugzilla?
> I am sorry. I overstepped here.
> 
> I do try to get everyone into the same boat. I have prepared the list, and 
> wrote about the work to.
> 
> And it feels offending to me if you imply that I do not try to work together. 
> I snatched here.
> 
> I would like to ask you to assume that we all want to work together and 
> consider a counter proposal when one is offered. Even if it is not done in 
> the best way.
> 
> Thanks.
> All the best
> 
> Peter
> 
>> 
>> All you need to do is to set up a search to filter on target milestone 5.0.0
>> 
>> It should return 37 issues.
>> In the meantime i figure out how to share search lists.
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 19, 2026, at 3:05 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Am 19.10.2026 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>> Can we maybe use this wiki page to coordinate work on AOO5:
>>>>> 
>>>>>          https://s.apache.org/AOO5-TODO
>>>> I dont like to maintain a confluence page.
>>>> 
>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&list_id=253306&namedcmd=5.0.0%20OpenIssues
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> Not sure if the list can be seen by others, but this is my reference list. 
>>>> There is a list for 4.2.0 in confluence with almost same issues open.
>>>> 
>>>>> TIA
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2026, at 7:08 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks for the Email! Your timing is perfect.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Right now, the main effort is working on getting `trunk`, and 
>>>>>> specifically the `AOO50X` branch to a relative stable place where we 
>>>>>> could do a Developer's Release; let's work on stuff that has an 
>>>>>> immediate positive impact and gets us closer to a release. So things 
>>>>>> like checking if AOO50X builds for you, if it works and where it 
>>>>>> doesn't. Things like that.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sure, it would be great to rip-out our current build structure for 
>>>>>> something "modern", for example, but focusing on that improves where are 
>>>>>> _are_ and doesn't move us forward, if you get my meaning. It's a lot of 
>>>>>> work that ends up with us being at the exact spot where we are now. In 
>>>>>> fact, it actually means we step back because now this whole new build 
>>>>>> system needs a lot more testing before we can ensure parity with what we 
>>>>>> already have. I am simply using the build system as a convenient 
>>>>>> example, nothing more, btw.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> AOO50X uses a newer version of C++ and baselines Python 3, so those are 
>>>>>> other good things to check.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2026, at 6:00 AM, Gaurav <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm Gaurav, a master's student in Applied Data Science at USC (Los
>>>>>>> Angeles). I work primarily in C++ and Python, and I'd like to volunteer
>>>>>>> with OpenOffice.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> To start, I'm happy to help with bug reproduction and triage, or small 
>>>>>>> C++
>>>>>>> bug fixes — whatever is most useful. I've gone through the New Volunteer
>>>>>>> Orientation modules [only say this if you actually do].
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Could someone point me to where help is most needed right now, or a good
>>>>>>> first bug to look at?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Gaurav Nagalapuram Venkataramanan
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Jim
>>>>>>   "This is an outrage!"
>>>>>>                         Tony Harrison
>>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Jim
>>>>>    "This is an outrage!"
>>>>>                          Tony Harrison
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> -- 
>>> Jim
>>>    "This is an outrage!"
>>>                          Tony Harrison
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
--
Jim
  "We are havin' it large!"
                        Tony Harrison

Reply via email to