> Ah, I'm looking forward to when you come asking *where* in > the code to fix it :)
That's easy to find. There are only about a dozen matches in the source code for RestrictedPath and RestrictedPaths ;-) > The idea was to have a feature which prevents users from > changing the respective setting. Nowadays, where the > configuration supports locking settings into "readonly" > state, probably nothing is to say against making this a > configuration setting. That was my concern, too, which is why I didn't understand the choice of a environment variable. On Windows XP, you have both "system variables" and "user variables". If both values are set, the user value overrides the system value. In fact, I just tried this, setting two different values for RestrictedPath, one in a system variable in the other in a user variable, and OOo used the user value. Is there something I'm missing? Allen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
