I guess I would have to buy Staroffice to know for sure but I guess I just don't see the difference. Just because they might be associated directly with Ooo doesn't mean they do not have to abide by the GNU. I don't actually think any of the discussed companies are doing anything wrong but if they were then so is Staroffice. Coating by StarOffice is still a violation if what Butler is doing is a violation. Maybe I am wrong here, but it seems to me the originator of the topic may have a personal beef of something. Maybe he bought it and is trying to get revenge or something. I did do a little research and found similar cases but found that the court found that the violations were minor infringements. In those cases the companies did not display the GNU notice. In this case Butler does display the notice.
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Probable-GPL-violations---Butler-Office-Pro-tp14662459p14999444.html Sent from the openoffice - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
