Hi Philipp, >> Btw. I'd also say that members of a CWS, as well as the owner/QA-rep, >> should be handled as if they were subscribed to the CC list. > > -1 the QA-Rep at least is not going to profit from these mails in the > least. Even as a member I don't want these notifications, there is > enough crap in my mail inbox every day already. I can see some > usefulness to me as owner but actually even then I don't really want to > get a mail every time one of the other one or two members commits > anything; usually what they are doing is rather independent.
Not sure if we have a misunderstanding here - I was not talking about commits, as in "svn commit". I was talking about changes to the CWS'es administrative data in EIS - adding a comment, changing one of the CWS properties, changing the CWS'es state, and the like. This is something which IMO happens seldom enough so that it won't really spam your intray. Like in IssueZilla, there could be a mechanism in the back-end which prevents mails from being sent to the instigator of the change himself. That way, you would only be noticed of changes done by other people to your CWS. On the other hand, if you say this is still too much, I'd be happy with the explicit opt-in you mention, too. Ciao Frank --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
