Jason, >> Yes, and it is still smaller, lighter with source code that is easier to >> understand than >> OO.o.
This is exactly my point! And just in case, I'm an Emacs user, so I have nothing against it But I've been hacking OOo code and Emacs code for sometime now, and I'm telling this just because I got a little bit worried about adding this kind of complexity just to implement things that are (in my humble opinion) so out-of-scope to an office suite. Edvaldo de Almeida ============================================== [email protected] Fone: +55-21-2252-0078 ============================================== --- On Thu, 1/1/09, Jason Stephenson <[email protected]> wrote: From: Jason Stephenson <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [dev] Browser and instant messenger To: [email protected] Date: Thursday, January 1, 2009, 8:55 PM Edvaldo Jr. wrote: > Can you imagine what was the word that came to my mind when I first > heard about adding an instant messenger and a browser to OpenOffice? > > > The word was EMACS!!! > > Emacs is famous (and to some people infamous!) just because the > software is the most complete do-anything-you-think-of in Free > Software world, as you surely know. Yes, and it is still smaller, lighter with source code that is easier to understand than OO.o. > > > Edvaldo de Almeida > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
