Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:30:39AM +0200, Frank Schoenheit - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote: > > [ Seems so, do you now strictly need 1.39? > > No, I think 1.34 would do, too. As said, a previous incarnation of the > CWS compiles fine with 1.34, but again, I didn't do extensive runtime > checks with this version.
Well, that I understood. Sorry for me not expressing better. The code as-is now will fail to build/work with system-boost < 1.39, I assume? > > Then we probably should adapt the system-boost check in configure; or > > we #ifdef it as necessary ] > > Ah, okay, will put this onto my TODO list (unless you volunteer, of > course :) ). That was the point of this question to find out what is needed :) Grüße/Regards, Rene --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
