Andy Allan wrote: > Your attitude stinks. Your attitude (and body) stinks more. I proposed the original, he was commenting on! I sat all night programming a binary encoding for OSM! Go look on the same 'weekend-wiki page' for my name, hence I didn't want to spend 2x 150 euro to sit somewhere else programming.
So if you want to have someone to say how GOOD you are. YOU ARE SO GOOD TO PROVIDE US SOME RUBY IMPLEMENTATION OF 0.6! Now go on stinking, because I highly doubt that you took the time to take a shower. My god, this is so pathetic, flaming on people that actually care about arguments given, being trolled over some code monkey that is able to type Ruby. As you might not noticed, if this was a programmer your arguments were *kind of* counter productive to get him coding. Simon: I hope you were not turned of to help around with OSM. Making things scalable is my first priority. Hence my C implementation of what they are trying to build. I'll not start with my 0.6 until the specs are finished and someone is actually using it. But don't think you have to wait very long for an concurrent work that has limits. I don't even imply bbox limits on my code. Network traffic has to be reduced, and this is currently what I am making. Yours Sincerely, Stefan de Konink _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
