One example would be the landuse=residential around Trimley St. Martin at: It's (currently) on Mapnik at http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.98797&lon=1.31644&zoom=15&layers=B000FTF But not on Osmarender layer per http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.98797&lon=1.31644&zoom=15&layers=0B00FTF
And yes, the area is still in the data -- if you request a re-render, I expect it'll reappear (I haven't). 2008/12/14 80n <[email protected]>: > Rowland > Can you make a couple of screen shots and describe what you see as being > wrong. Then someone might be able to investigate further. > > 80n > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Rowland Shaw <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> It's done it again since my previous message, too... >> >> >> 2008/12/13 Rowland Shaw <[email protected]>: >> > Every so often, the t...@h tiles show some really odd combinations of >> > data which show older versions of older nodes (for example, not >> > showing access=permissive which was added to a way) whilst still >> > showing newer ways that have been since added -- requesting a >> > re-render through Informationfreeway has fixed it on the occasions >> > I've noticed this. >> > >> > Primarily, I've noticed this in this sort of area: >> > >> > http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=52.02923827991905&lon=1.2023025518558124&zoom=16&layers=0B000F000F >> > >> > At first, I thought someone had reverted several hours of work, but it >> > seems to be something else, that has now repeated itself two or three >> > times (that I'm aware of) >> > >> > Any ideas of the cause? >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
