Cross-posting to t...@h list for FYI. I'm building a new db on the server now, it should be ready to switch over tomorrow. I just wanted to verify the proper method for applying changes after a db import to make sure this doesn't happen again.
When I built the server I imported the latest planet and then applied that days diff as well as all of the daily diffs from the latest planet up to the current day. I then let osmosis run in read change interval mode and update the rest of the db. So if I was doing this today (Sunday) I would import the planet from last Wednesday, then apply the change from wednesday-thursday, thursday-friday, friday-saturday, saturday-sunday. Once this was done, then I'd set the timestamp to 12am sunday and run osmosis in read-change-interval mode to get the db current. Is this the correct method? -Jeremy > All in that sort of time frame, so it looks like we've found our cause :) > > > 2008/12/14 <[email protected]>: >> This could be the fault of my ROMA server. The landuse way is not >> present on >> my server, although it does appear to be on the others and on the main >> API. >> >> I'm not sure how it's missing - my server must have somehow fallen out of >> sync >> at some point. Potlach lists that way as being created Nov 28th 2008, >> were the >> other things you noticed missing also created around that time? >> >> -Jeremy >> >> Original Message ----------------------- >> One example would be the landuse=residential around Trimley St. Martin >> at: >> It's (currently) on Mapnik at >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.98797&lon=1.31644&zoom=15&layers=B000FTF >> But not on Osmarender layer per >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.98797&lon=1.31644&zoom=15&layers=0B00FTF >> >> And yes, the area is still in the data -- if you request a re-render, >> I expect it'll reappear (I haven't). >> >> >> 2008/12/14 80n <[email protected]>: >>> Rowland >>> Can you make a couple of screen shots and describe what you see as being >>> wrong. Then someone might be able to investigate further. >>> >>> 80n >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Rowland Shaw <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> It's done it again since my previous message, too... >>>> >>>> >>>> 2008/12/13 Rowland Shaw <[email protected]>: >>>> > Every so often, the t...@h tiles show some really odd combinations of >>>> > data which show older versions of older nodes (for example, not >>>> > showing access=permissive which was added to a way) whilst still >>>> > showing newer ways that have been since added -- requesting a >>>> > re-render through Informationfreeway has fixed it on the occasions >>>> > I've noticed this. >>>> > >>>> > Primarily, I've noticed this in this sort of area: >>>> > >>>> > http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=52.02923827991905&lon=1.2023025518558124&zoom=16&layers=0B000F000F >>>> > >>>> > At first, I thought someone had reverted several hours of work, but >>>> > it >>>> > seems to be something else, that has now repeated itself two or three >>>> > times (that I'm aware of) >>>> > >>>> > Any ideas of the cause? >>>> > >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev >> > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
