All in that sort of time frame, so it looks like we've found our cause :)
2008/12/14 <[email protected]>: > This could be the fault of my ROMA server. The landuse way is not present on > my server, although it does appear to be on the others and on the main API. > > I'm not sure how it's missing - my server must have somehow fallen out of sync > at some point. Potlach lists that way as being created Nov 28th 2008, were > the > other things you noticed missing also created around that time? > > -Jeremy > > Original Message ----------------------- > One example would be the landuse=residential around Trimley St. Martin at: > It's (currently) on Mapnik at > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.98797&lon=1.31644&zoom=15&layers=B000FTF > But not on Osmarender layer per > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.98797&lon=1.31644&zoom=15&layers=0B00FTF > > And yes, the area is still in the data -- if you request a re-render, > I expect it'll reappear (I haven't). > > > 2008/12/14 80n <[email protected]>: >> Rowland >> Can you make a couple of screen shots and describe what you see as being >> wrong. Then someone might be able to investigate further. >> >> 80n >> >> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Rowland Shaw <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> It's done it again since my previous message, too... >>> >>> >>> 2008/12/13 Rowland Shaw <[email protected]>: >>> > Every so often, the t...@h tiles show some really odd combinations of >>> > data which show older versions of older nodes (for example, not >>> > showing access=permissive which was added to a way) whilst still >>> > showing newer ways that have been since added -- requesting a >>> > re-render through Informationfreeway has fixed it on the occasions >>> > I've noticed this. >>> > >>> > Primarily, I've noticed this in this sort of area: >>> > >>> > http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=52.02923827991905&lon=1.2023025518558124&zoom=16&layers=0B000F000F >>> > >>> > At first, I thought someone had reverted several hours of work, but it >>> > seems to be something else, that has now repeated itself two or three >>> > times (that I'm aware of) >>> > >>> > Any ideas of the cause? >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev > > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
