Dave Stubbs wrote: > Who needs SQL? > http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.5/node/292984561/ways > > So yes. It is.
Thanks very interesting; I didn't realise this could do the trick. > The API's Way.to_xml_node method strips out invisible nodes that it reads. > http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.5/way/4043588 <-- no node > The OldWay.to_xml_node history calls do not. > http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.5/way/4043588/history <-- node > (despite way timestamp saved after node was deleted) So I collected all the 'problematic' things. I think by what you mention, it can be trivially fixed just by fetching all nodes and reinserting them again? > Potlatch also doesn't try to filter > deleted nodes, so it'll appear in Potlatch too (and be successfully > resurected if you save the way). This could be an award winning observation :) Can we test this is in a way? Stefan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
