Maarten Deen wrote: >> No it doesn't; if you do a "map" query against the API, you will *not* >> receive deleted objects, and that's what JOSM does in step 4. It would >> not be feasible to query each object individually. > > Why not? How is this different from a user having to go through all his > changes manually and download every node/way he changed manually?
It's not feasible because it would be a very quick way for JOSM to get itself banned if it started trying to download every single object in an area individually like this. >> However one thing that JOSM could do is compare the list of objects in >> memory with those returned by the "map" query and thus find out which >> ones are "missing" from the map query, then request those individually >> to confirm they are really "410 Gone". > > Well, depending on how you downloaded the data in the first place. It is not > said that the data came from a download in JOSM. If there data didn't come from the API then there can't be a conflict of this sort as the objects would be new objects and therefore couldn't have already been deleted on the server. >> The latter (it is exactly the way as used in 0.5). But it does not >> upload the changes in the order you made them, instead it first uploads >> all creations, then all modifications, then all deletions. > > By doing it that way, does it give an errormessage with the offending node/way > id? That would be really helpful. Recent versions of JOSM already report the detailed error message that the server sends to the user - that should include details of the problem object. Tom -- Tom Hughes ([email protected]) http://www.compton.nu/ _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
