I am aware of and accept different point of views about the project. I am only speaking my own opinion and also I don't agree that it is not a discussion for dev list. Right now there is a unique chance to get restyling a shot because Mapbox is involved and obviously they have the expertise to do it or at least initiate and maybe lead the effort.
I do agree that wishful thinking threads do not belong on dev mailing list but I would say that right now a discussion like this should happen here, again because of Mapbox folks looking for areas to be improved. I would love to hear from them on this topic, preferably with all the gory technical details (mapnik 0.x vs 2 etc). Pawel Pawel Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > >Am 13.10.2012 13:55, schrieb Pawel Paprota: >> It is not necessarily about changing WHAT is displayed but changing HOW it >> is displayed. Current style is simply not up to the standard in terms of >> esthetics for a project that aspires to be more than a database. >I suspect (well actually I know) that you will find a very wide range of >opinions on your later statement, from supporting having no public map >at all (just a database) to the full blown google look-a-like. That >specific discussion is however very off topic for the dev list. > >Simon > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
