W dniu 16.04.2018 o 11:42, Christoph Hormann pisze: > There are different definitions of what kind of operations and processes > you call "generalization".
Thanks for showing the examples what can be seen as generalization, this is quite wide subject: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartographic_generalization On osm-carto we also use types generalization (like meadow and grassland shown in the same way), which is very different than the one in the original message. > You need to keep in mind that both geometric generalization and lossy > vector data compression operations are largely incompatible with the > current goals of OSM-Carto: > > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/blob/master/CARTOGRAPHY.md I don't think this is true. For example making borders simpler increases clarity, while previous state was creating optical illusions. -- "My method is uncertain/ It's a mess but it's working" [F. Apple] _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
