On 05/12/2019 19:24, Sören Reinecke wrote:
That's a shame. It looks like you're trying to solve the part of the
problem that isn't really much of a problem (see Richard's most recent
email on the tagging list, amongst others) but not addressing the bit
that actually doesn't have a good solution right now.
> Are you planning to make something that can be integrated directly
into that (or mkgmap, or osmand etc.**).?
No, this is not my aim.
Turning the question round slightly, while still trying to keep it
relevant for the dev list - what issue was it that you hit that led you
to conclude that (initially) tag homogenisation for specific tags was a
goal worth pursuing, followed by the initiative to create a "master list
of "tag X means the same as Y"?
dev mailing list