to conclude that (initially) tag homogenisation for specific tags was a
goal worth pursuing, followed by the initiative to create a "master list
of "tag X means the same as Y"?
The situation of that I needed to support both `diaper` and `changing_table` led me to that idea.
> That's a shame.
Oh sorry, that's not currently my goal but it can be to build an universal specification to convert between different formattings. See also my latest answer of the quote I was answering to, where I draw the options which are available to me.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] tagtransform for OSM - A effort make tagging and using OSM data easier; bridging different worlds together
From: Andy Townsend
To: Sören Reinecke
CC:
On 05/12/2019 19:24, Sören Reinecke wrote:
>
> > Are you planning to make something that can be integrated directly
> into that (or mkgmap, or osmand etc.**).?
>
> No, this is not my aim.
>
That's a shame. It looks like you're trying to solve the part of the
problem that isn't really much of a problem (see Richard's most recent
email on the tagging list, amongst others) but not addressing the bit
that actually doesn't have a good solution right now.
Turning the question round slightly, while still trying to keep it
relevant for the dev list - what issue was it that you hit that led you
to conclude that (initially) tag homogenisation for specific tags was a
goal worth pursuing, followed by the initiative to create a "master list
of "tag X means the same as Y"?
Best Regards,
Andy
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
