On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:48:00AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:55:42PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]> > > Passing the "struct netdev_stats" to append_port_stat10() and > append_port_stat11() by value, rather than through a pointer, looks > needlessly inefficient to me (although possibly GCC optimizes this > out). I'd prefer to use a pointer.
Thanks. I'm unsure why I chose to pass by value. I'll fix that up and repost. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
