> I would probably use a name other than rtnl_stats since they aren't > actually that. The name must have gotten carried around for a while. >
I renamed it "vport_stats" and will merge shortly. Otherwise it seems fine (the split between dpif-linux, netdev-linux, > and, netdev-vport is pretty awkward in general though). > Agreed. I briefly took a crack at fixing this, but it's a surprising difficult problem. I'm hoping that once the flow based tunneling and the patch port optimizations are done, we'll be able to achieve better layering. Ethan
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
