:)
Ok, yeah --Gurkan ----- Original Message ---- From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tue, September 28, 2010 11:52:36 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 That's fine with me! But I'd rather not call it 1.0.0-GA but only 1.0.0. It's obvious that it's Generally Available now ;) LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 > To: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 8:43 AM > Hello, > > I think we have to switch to GA. Because people think that > Alpha is not > production ready! So 1.0.0 GA will be the best! > > > Thanks; > > --Gurkan > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tue, September 28, 2010 11:22:41 AM > Subject: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 > > Hi folks! > > We had a few very important changes in the last few weeks > > *) mem leak fix > *) upgrade to a few newer lib versions > *) lazy SessionContext creation > *) site fix (currently in progress locally) > *) PrePassivate, PostActivate, and AroundTimeout support > *) lots of EJB improvements > > I'd like to run the release tasks for 1.0.0-alpha-3 > tomorrow, WDYT? > If you like to complete/test some feature which you think > must go into this > release, then please ping me. > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > >
