i suggest to move the documentation to the confluence wiki. it's easier for the community to contribute to the documentation.
regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2010/9/28 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > Any1 got some spare time to review our documentation? > > http://openwebbeans.apache.org/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/documents/userguide.pdf > > I think a few things are pretty outdated already. > > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Gerhard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Gerhard <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 11:02 AM > > i know - that was the reason why i > > wrote: > > > basically i would vote +1. > > > > +1 for the maintenance branch. > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > Courses in English and German > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > 2010/9/28 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > > > > the problem with OWB-444 is that it is pretty much > > work and changes a lot > > > of internal things. > > > Thus I'd like to postpone it for a 1.1.x release and > > now ship 1.0.0 because > > > it's otherwise really stable. I'll create a 1.0.x > > maintenance branch while > > > releasing 1.0.0 and move the trunk to 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. > > > > > > If we find any important problems (blockers, mem-leaks > > and such things) in > > > 1.0.0, then we'll fix it in the branch and ship it as > > 1.0.1 . > > > > > > All daily stuff and fixes will then be done in the > > 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT trunk. > > > > > > Any objections? > > > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Gerhard <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > From: Gerhard <[email protected]> > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing > > owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 10:38 AM > > > > hello, > > > > > > > > basically i would vote +1. > > > > however, as mentioned earlier it would be great > > if we > > > > finish OWB-444 before > > > > the release of v1. > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > gerhard > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2010/9/28 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > cool thanks! > > > > > > > > > > I'll commit a few pom changes and fix our > > ugly site > > > > today ;) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > > > strub > > > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Eric Covener <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > From: Eric Covener <[email protected]> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing > > > > owb-1.0.0-alpha-3 > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 9:43 > > AM > > > > > > FYI trying to get OWB-456 in today > > > > > > before tag > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
