i know - that was the reason why i wrote:
> basically i would vote +1.

+1 for the maintenance branch.

regards,
gerhard

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces



2010/9/28 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>

> the problem with OWB-444 is that it is pretty much work and changes a lot
> of internal things.
> Thus I'd like to postpone it for a 1.1.x release and now ship 1.0.0 because
> it's otherwise really stable. I'll create a 1.0.x maintenance branch while
> releasing 1.0.0 and move the trunk to 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
>
> If we find any important problems (blockers, mem-leaks and such things) in
> 1.0.0, then we'll fix it in the branch and ship it as 1.0.1 .
>
> All daily stuff and fixes will then be done in the 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT trunk.
>
> Any objections?
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Gerhard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From: Gerhard <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0-alpha-3
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 10:38 AM
> > hello,
> >
> > basically i would vote +1.
> > however, as mentioned earlier it would be great if we
> > finish OWB-444 before
> > the release of v1.
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
> >
> >
> > 2010/9/28 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
> >
> > > cool thanks!
> > >
> > > I'll commit a few pom changes and fix our ugly site
> > today ;)
> > >
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > > --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Eric Covener <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Eric Covener <[email protected]>
> > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing
> > owb-1.0.0-alpha-3
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 9:43 AM
> > > > FYI trying to get OWB-456 in today
> > > > before tag
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to