All done. VOTE sent, please review and give feedback please. First release ever in OpenWebBeans for me, so something may has failed :D
Jean-Louis 2013/11/8 Karl Kildén <[email protected]> > 1+ > > > On 8 November 2013 11:52, David Blevins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 :) > > > > > > On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:34 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Ok, if everyone is ok, I gonna try to roll the 1.2.1. > > > Even if the vote gets canceled, it's still a good exercise for me :D > > > > > > JLouis > > > > > > > > > 2013/11/8 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > > > > >> No problem, let it as is. > > >> > > >> It's just easier to keep track of what really was done and part of the > > >> release imo. > > >> Especially if you have to reroll. > > >> > > >> > > >> LieGrue, > > >> strub > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> ________________________________ > > >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > >>> To: openwebbeans-dev <[email protected]>; Mark Struberg < > > >> [email protected]> > > >>> Sent: Friday, 8 November 2013, 10:00 > > >>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> oops sorry :s > > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau > > >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> 2013/11/8 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > > >>>> nope, we first do the RESOLVED and not closed. > > >>>> > > >>>> The reason is that we bulk-change them later to closed once we > finally > > >> shipped the release. > > >>>> > > >>>> LieGrue, > > >>>> strub > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> ________________________________ > > >>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > > >>>>> To: [email protected] > > >>>>> Cc: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > >>>>> Sent: Thursday, 7 November 2013, 21:49 > > >>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Hey guys, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Trying to prepare the release. > > >>>>> Was cleaning up JIRA > > >>>>> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OWB%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Actually, JIRA are not marked as resolved and the "fix for" > > attribute is > > >>>>> not set. > > >>>>> Usually, I'm used to set RESOLVED issues to CLOSED and set the "fix > > for" > > >>>>> field to XXX. > > >>>>> Can someone help me to check that list and filter those who are > > really > > >>>>> resolved? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Then, I can finish the README from the release notes. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Then, creating, publishing and doing the legal stuff is not that > long > > >> nor > > >>>>> hard. > > >>>>> Thanks for your help. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Jean-Louis > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> *tested > > >>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau > > >>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > >>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > >>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > > >>>>>>> testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad > as > > >> I > > >>>>>>> thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it > > >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau > > >>>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > >>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > >>>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>: > > >>>>>>>> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the > > >> fix. > > >>>>>>>> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that > was > > >> my > > >>>>>> main > > >>>>>>>> purpose. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> JLouis > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> sure, go on. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> LieGrue, > > >>>>>>>>> strub > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> ________________________________ > > >>>>>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41 > > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always > > >> wait > > >>>>>> for a > > >>>>>>>>>> release or always for a bug to fix. > > >>>>>>>>>> We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release > more > > >> even > > >>>>>> if > > >>>>>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>>> identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we > are > > >> able > > >>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>> release more than once a year. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 > is > > >> not > > >>>>>> fully > > >>>>>>>>>> fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things > to > > >>>>>> fix/do. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can > > >> fork > > >>>>>> as we > > >>>>>>>>>> did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it > > >> gets > > >>>>>> out. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/objections? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> JLouis > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> 2013/11/6 David Blevins <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On the OPENJPA-2335 note. Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds > > >> guys > > >>>>>> on the > > >>>>>>>>>>> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache > TomEE > > >> from > > >>>>>>>>> their > > >>>>>>>>>>> product unless they get a release. They've been asking since > > >> July. > > >>>>>>>>> Seems > > >>>>>>>>>>> there cutoff is Friday. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is > to > > >> do > > >>>>>> two > > >>>>>>>>>>> releases. One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed > and > > >>>>>> OpenJPA > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0 is released. Then there's no need to rush. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> -David > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg < > [email protected]> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a > > >>>>>> regression > > >>>>>>>>>>> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my > > >> old > > >>>>>> apps > > >>>>>>>>> which > > >>>>>>>>>>> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test > > >>>>>> (currently > > >>>>>>>>>>> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> strub > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Still there at least for the moment lol > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss > > >> with > > >>>>>> Romain > > >>>>>>>>>>> but > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a > > >> look we > > >>>>>>>>> could > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> start the release today and have binaries for vote today. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean Louis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" < > > >>>>>> [email protected]> a > > >>>>>>>>>>> écrit : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a > > >> patch > > >>>>>> but > > >>>>>>>>> it > > >>>>>>>>>>> needs > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt > > >>>>>>>>>>> misunderstand). > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" < > > >> [email protected]> > > >>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>> écrit : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release > > >>>>>> today. > > >>>>>>>>> But > > >>>>>>>>>>> I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few > > >> days > > >>>>>> overdue > > >>>>>>>>>>> :) I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping > > >> in for > > >>>>>>>>> him to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> get > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release started. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -David > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < > > >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should be really easy. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone likes to take over? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time > > >> is a > > >>>>>> bit > > >>>>>>>>>>> short > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week... > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lol > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were > > >> waiting > > >>>>>> some > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixes > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe > > >> today or > > >>>>>> so. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" < > > >>>>>> [email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -David > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>> Jean-Louis > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Jean-Louis > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jean-Louis > > > > > -- Jean-Louis
