PS: if you release 1.2.1 please activate the cdi11 module. Maybe we should append prealpha to the version but it is needed by batchee and bval N+1 Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/8 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > reviewed it for what i was able to do, some review from > Gerhard/Mark/Arne would be great too > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>: >> Hey guys, >> >> Trying to prepare the release. >> Was cleaning up JIRA >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OWB%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >> >> >> Actually, JIRA are not marked as resolved and the "fix for" attribute is >> not set. >> Usually, I'm used to set RESOLVED issues to CLOSED and set the "fix for" >> field to XXX. >> Can someone help me to check that list and filter those who are really >> resolved? >> >> Then, I can finish the README from the release notes. >> >> Then, creating, publishing and doing the legal stuff is not that long nor >> hard. >> Thanks for your help. >> >> Jean-Louis >> >> >> >> >> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> >>> *tested >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >>> >>> >>> >>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: >>> > testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad as I >>> > thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it >>> > Romain Manni-Bucau >>> > Twitter: @rmannibucau >>> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>: >>> >> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the fix. >>> >> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases. >>> >> >>> >> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was my >>> main >>> >> purpose. >>> >> >>> >> JLouis >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>> >> >>> >>> sure, go on. >>> >>> >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> >>> strub >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >________________________________ >>> >>> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> >>> >>> >To: [email protected] >>> >>> >Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41 >>> >>> >Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> >here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always wait >>> for a >>> >>> >release or always for a bug to fix. >>> >>> >We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more even >>> if >>> >>> we >>> >>> >identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are able >>> to >>> >>> >release more than once a year. >>> >>> > >>> >>> >So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is not >>> fully >>> >>> >fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to >>> fix/do. >>> >>> > >>> >>> >For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can fork >>> as we >>> >>> >did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it gets >>> out. >>> >>> > >>> >>> >Any thoughts/objections? >>> >>> > >>> >>> >JLouis >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> >2013/11/6 David Blevins <[email protected]> >>> >>> > >>> >>> >> On the OPENJPA-2335 note. Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds guys >>> on the >>> >>> >> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE from >>> >>> their >>> >>> >> product unless they get a release. They've been asking since July. >>> >>> Seems >>> >>> >> there cutoff is Friday. >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to do >>> two >>> >>> >> releases. One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and >>> OpenJPA >>> >>> >> 2.3.0 is released. Then there's no need to rush. >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> -David >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a >>> regression >>> >>> >> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my old >>> apps >>> >>> which >>> >>> >> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test >>> (currently >>> >>> >> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa. >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX. >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > LieGrue, >>> >>> >> > strub >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> >> ________________________________ >>> >>> >> >> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> >>> >>> >> >> To: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49 >>> >>> >> >> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> Hey, >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> Still there at least for the moment lol >>> >>> >> >> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss with >>> Romain >>> >>> >> but >>> >>> >> >> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a look we >>> >>> could >>> >>> >> >> start the release today and have binaries for vote today. >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> Thanks a lot >>> >>> >> >> Jean Louis >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" < >>> [email protected]> a >>> >>> >> écrit : >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a patch >>> but >>> >>> it >>> >>> >> needs >>> >>> >> >>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt >>> >>> >> misunderstand). >>> >>> >> >>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(. >>> >>> >> >>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> >>> a >>> >>> >> écrit : >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release >>> today. >>> >>> But >>> >>> >> I >>> >>> >> >>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few days >>> overdue >>> >>> >> :) I >>> >>> >> >>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :) >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >>> >> >>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping in for >>> >>> him to >>> >>> >> >>> get >>> >>> >> >>>> the release started. >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >>> >> >>>> -David >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >>> >> >>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < >>> >>> [email protected]> >>> >>> >> >>>> wrote: >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>> Hi, >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning. >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first. >>> >>> >> >>>>>> Should be really easy. >>> >>> >> >>>>>> Anyone likes to take over? >>> >>> >> >>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time is a >>> bit >>> >>> >> short >>> >>> >> >>>> this >>> >>> >> >>>>>> week... >>> >>> >> >>>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> LieGrue, >>> >>> >> >>>>>> strub >>> >>> >> >>>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Cc: >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24 >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Lol >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were waiting >>> some >>> >>> >> >>> fixes >>> >>> >> >>>>>> but >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe today or >>> so. >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" < >>> [email protected]> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> a écrit : >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release? >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> -David >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >>>>> -- >>> >>> >> >>>>> Jean-Louis >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> >-- >>> >>> >Jean-Louis >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Jean-Louis >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jean-Louis
