+1 :)
On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:34 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, if everyone is ok, I gonna try to roll the 1.2.1. > Even if the vote gets canceled, it's still a good exercise for me :D > > JLouis > > > 2013/11/8 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >> No problem, let it as is. >> >> It's just easier to keep track of what really was done and part of the >> release imo. >> Especially if you have to reroll. >> >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >>> To: openwebbeans-dev <[email protected]>; Mark Struberg < >> [email protected]> >>> Sent: Friday, 8 November 2013, 10:00 >>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? >>> >>> >>> oops sorry :s >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2013/11/8 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >>>> nope, we first do the RESOLVED and not closed. >>>> >>>> The reason is that we bulk-change them later to closed once we finally >> shipped the release. >>>> >>>> LieGrue, >>>> strub >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Cc: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>>>> Sent: Thursday, 7 November 2013, 21:49 >>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hey guys, >>>>> >>>>> Trying to prepare the release. >>>>> Was cleaning up JIRA >>>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OWB%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Actually, JIRA are not marked as resolved and the "fix for" attribute is >>>>> not set. >>>>> Usually, I'm used to set RESOLVED issues to CLOSED and set the "fix for" >>>>> field to XXX. >>>>> Can someone help me to check that list and filter those who are really >>>>> resolved? >>>>> >>>>> Then, I can finish the README from the release notes. >>>>> >>>>> Then, creating, publishing and doing the legal stuff is not that long >> nor >>>>> hard. >>>>> Thanks for your help. >>>>> >>>>> Jean-Louis >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>> *tested >>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau >>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/11/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: >>>>>>> testes the shadown part just one minute ago and seems not as bad as >> I >>>>>>> thought so repassing tcks and I'll commit it >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau >>>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2013/11/7 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>> If that is a blocking issue, I agree, but why not committing the >> fix. >>>>>>>> You have one, even if not perfect, it works in some cases. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If definitely not a good patch, who can help fixing that, that was >> my >>>>>> main >>>>>>>> purpose. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> JLouis >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2013/11/7 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> sure, go on. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 21:41 >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> here are my two sense, cause it does not make sense to always >> wait >>>>>> for a >>>>>>>>>> release or always for a bug to fix. >>>>>>>>>> We depend on a lot of project, so I would prefer to release more >> even >>>>>> if >>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>> identified some bugs we cannot fix at a time but at least we are >> able >>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> release more than once a year. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So, as nobody objected, I will start OWB release. If OWB-912 is >> not >>>>>> fully >>>>>>>>>> fixed, we can push a 1.2.2 soon because we have other things to >>>>>> fix/do. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For OpenJPA, if the vote is not launched before Friday, we can >> fork >>>>>> as we >>>>>>>>>> did in the past and integrate the final release as soon as it >> gets >>>>>> out. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/objections? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> JLouis >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2013/11/6 David Blevins <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On the OPENJPA-2335 note. Alex, Tim, Judah and all the 3ds >> guys >>>>>> on the >>>>>>>>>>> users@tomee list are saying they'll have to drop Apache TomEE >> from >>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>>> product unless they get a release. They've been asking since >> July. >>>>>>>>> Seems >>>>>>>>>>> there cutoff is Friday. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Looks like the most pragmatic way to make everyone happy is to >> do >>>>>> two >>>>>>>>>>> releases. One now and one again when OPENJPA-2335 is fixed and >>>>>> OpenJPA >>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0 is released. Then there's no need to rush. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -David >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 5, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, TomEE is mostly blocked by OPENJPA-2335. This is a >>>>>> regression >>>>>>>>>>> which is in there since a few months and blows up many of my >> old >>>>>> apps >>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>>> run fine with openjpa-2.2.2 and lower. I've committed a test >>>>>> (currently >>>>>>>>>>> failing of course) to the 2.3.x branch in openjpa. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm mostly offline this week due to holding talks on W-JAX. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2013, 6:49 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Still there at least for the moment lol >>>>>>>>>>>>> Did not get news from Mark on the issue above. We discuss >> with >>>>>> Romain >>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>> we wanted another feedback. If someone else could have a >> look we >>>>>>>>> could >>>>>>>>>>>>> start the release today and have binaries for vote today. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean Louis >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 6 nov. 2013 06:29, "Romain Manni-Bucau" < >>>>>> [email protected]> a >>>>>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have a regression (found on tomee list). I proposed a >> patch >>>>>> but >>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>> needs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some review (Mark wanted to have a deeper look if I didnt >>>>>>>>>>> misunderstand). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is clearly blocking ATM :(. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 6 nov. 2013 04:39, "David Blevins" < >> [email protected]> >>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis fixed the issue and mentioned he would release >>>>>> today. >>>>>>>>> But >>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also know the "release" of his first baby boy is a few >> days >>>>>> overdue >>>>>>>>>>> :) I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect he's suddenly got quite busy. :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we don't hear from him tomorrow, I'll plan on jumping >> in for >>>>>>>>> him to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release started. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -David >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok lemme at least try this morning. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/11/4 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should fix the session destroy issue first. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should be really easy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone likes to take over? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have 3 conf talks to deliver this week, thus my time >> is a >>>>>> bit >>>>>>>>>>> short >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 8:24 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time for 1.2.1? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lol >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been discussing with Mark for a while. We were >> waiting >>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I should start the release early this week, maybe >> today or >>>>>> so. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 4 nov. 2013 03:09, "David Blevins" < >>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone have any objections if I roll a 1.2.1 release? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -David >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Jean-Louis >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jean-Louis >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Jean-Louis
