No problem, I've opened a JIRA issue and attached a patch that resolves the issue in my testing.
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Joe! > > Thanks for checking. I'll try to reproduce tonight or tomorrow and will > abort the VOTE if I can reproduce it. > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > > On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 21:22, Joseph Bergmark <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I walked though the code in debug, and from what I can tell it appears > to > > be an issue with the way the URLs are being generated (at least on my > > machine). > > > > My breakpoints in AbstractMetaDataDiscovery & CdiArchive are showing URLs > > for my classes directory that look like: > > file:file:/C:/workspaces/owb-1.2.5/samples/guess/target/classes/ > > > > WebScannerService createURLFromMarkerFile has what appears to be a > correct > > String "file:/C:/workspaces/owb-1.2.5/samples/guess/target/classes/" > > from > > findBeansXmlBases, but it prepends "file:" again here on line 156: > > > > //X TODO check! > > addPath = "file:" + url + > > "META-INF/beans.xml"; > > > > OWB-953 changed this class so that addPath is what is added to the list > of > > URLs as previously it used url, so it is possible this is a small > > regression for non-jar based URLs in web modules. > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Gerhard Petracek < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> i've upgraded several projects to v1.2.5 (e.g. [1] and [2]) and all > > tests > >> look fine. > >> -> +1 > >> > >> regards, > >> gerhard > >> > >> [1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork > >> [2] > >> > >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo?p=deltaspike.git;a=summary > >> > >> > >> > >> 2014-05-24 20:24 GMT+02:00 Joseph Bergmark <[email protected]>: > >> > >> > I set up my build environment on a new machine, so its possible > > I'm > >> > fighting a configuration problem, but after a successful build from > > the > >> > 1.2.5 source zip, I'm having trouble with the guess sample app > > which is > >> my > >> > normal go-to for quick testing. > >> > > >> > It looks like an EL or bean discovery problem, as loginBean isn't > > being > >> > found. I'll do a bit more digging but was curious if anyone had > > luck > >> with > >> > the samples or the guess sample app in particular. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:42 PM, David Blevins > > <[email protected] > >> > >wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > David Blevins > >> > > http://twitter.com/dblevins > >> > > http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > > > >> > > On May 23, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Mark Struberg > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache > > OpenWebBeans-1.2.5 . > >> > > > > >> > > > This is a maintenance release of the owb_1.2.x branch and > > targets the > >> > > CDI-1.0 specification. > >> > > > > >> > > > The ReleaseNotes are available online: > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310844&version=12326814 > >> > > > > >> > > > Maven staging repo: > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/ > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > SVN source tag: > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.5/ > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Source Release: > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.2.5/openwebbeans-1.2.5-source-release.zip > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Binary release: > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.2.5/openwebbeans-distribution-1.2.5-binary.zip > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > PGP release key 2FDB81B1 > >> > > > > >> > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > The VOTE will be open for 72 hours. > >> > > > [ ] +1 approve > >> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > >> > > > [ ] -1 veto (and reason why) > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Here is my +1 > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > LieGrue, > >> > > > strub > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
