corrected subject: VOTE got cancelled. 




> On , Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > oki reviewed it again and the effect is that we do not pick up 
> WEB-INF/beans.xml.
> That means that we do not pass the TCK and as such must not ship thisbinary.
> 
> The VOTE is CANCELLED and I gonna fix it and re-roll the release.
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>  On Sunday, 25 May 2014, 16:18, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>>  >t he question is whether this is a heavy regression or whether we can 
> defer this 
>>  to 1.2.6...
>>  Given that 1.2.4 worked and we only fixed a few bugs I'd let it run.
>> 
>> 
>>  LieGrue,
>>  strub
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>   On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 22:23, Joseph Bergmark 
> <[email protected]> 
>>  wrote:
>>>   > No problem, I've opened a JIRA issue and attached a patch 
> that 
>>  resolves the
>>>   issue in my testing.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Mark Struberg 
> <[email protected]> 
>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>    Hi Joe!
>>>> 
>>>>    Thanks for checking. I'll try to reproduce tonight or 
> tomorrow and 
>>  will
>>>>    abort the VOTE if I can reproduce it.
>>>> 
>>>>    txs and LieGrue,
>>>>    strub
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>    > On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 21:22, Joseph Bergmark 
>>>   <[email protected]>
>>>>    wrote:
>>>>    > > I walked though the code in debug, and from what I can 
> tell 
>>  it 
>>>   appears
>>>>    to
>>>>    > be an issue with the way the URLs are being generated (at 
> least 
>>  on my
>>>>    > machine).
>>>>    >
>>>>    > My breakpoints in AbstractMetaDataDiscovery & CdiArchive 
> are 
>>>   showing URLs
>>>>    > for my classes directory that look like:
>>>>    > 
> file:file:/C:/workspaces/owb-1.2.5/samples/guess/target/classes/
>>>>    >
>>>>    > WebScannerService createURLFromMarkerFile has what appears 
> to be 
>>  a
>>>>    correct
>>>>    > String 
>>>   
> "file:/C:/workspaces/owb-1.2.5/samples/guess/target/classes/"
>>>>    > from
>>>>    > findBeansXmlBases, but it prepends "file:" again 
> here 
>>  on 
>>>   line 156:
>>>>    >
>>>>    >                     //X TODO check!
>>>>    >                     addPath = "file:" + url +
>>>>    > "META-INF/beans.xml";
>>>>    >
>>>>    > OWB-953 changed this class so that addPath is what is added 
> to 
>>  the 
>>>   list
>>>>    of
>>>>    > URLs as previously it used url, so it is possible this is a 
> small
>>>>    > regression for non-jar based URLs in web modules.
>>>>    >
>>>>    >
>>>>    >
>>>>    > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Gerhard Petracek <
>>>>    > [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>    >
>>>>    >>  i've upgraded several projects to v1.2.5 (e.g. [1] 
> and 
>>  [2]) 
>>>   and all
>>>>    > tests
>>>>    >>  look fine.
>>>>    >>  -> +1
>>>>    >>
>>>>    >>  regards,
>>>>    >>  gerhard
>>>>    >>
>>>>    >>  [1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork
>>>>    >>  [2]
>>>>    >>
>>>>    >>
>>>>    >
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo?p=deltaspike.git;a=summary
>>>>    >>
>>>>    >>
>>>>    >>
>>>>    >>  2014-05-24 20:24 GMT+02:00 Joseph Bergmark 
>>>   <[email protected]>:
>>>>    >>
>>>>    >>  > I set up my build environment on a new machine, so 
> its 
>>>   possible
>>>>    > I'm
>>>>    >>  > fighting a configuration problem, but after a 
>>  successful 
>>>   build from
>>>>    > the
>>>>    >>  > 1.2.5 source zip, I'm having trouble with the 
> guess 
>> 
>>>   sample app
>>>>    > which is
>>>>    >>  my
>>>>    >>  > normal go-to for quick testing.
>>>>    >>  >
>>>>    >>  > It looks like an EL or bean discovery problem, as 
>>  loginBean 
>>>   isn't
>>>>    > being
>>>>    >>  > found.  I'll do a bit more digging but was 
> curious 
>>  if 
>>>   anyone had
>>>>    > luck
>>>>    >>  with
>>>>    >>  > the samples or the guess sample app in particular.
>>>>    >>  >
>>>>    >>  >
>>>>    >>  > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:42 PM, David Blevins
>>>>    > <[email protected]
>>>>    >>  > >wrote:
>>>>    >>  >
>>>>    >>  > > +1
>>>>    >>  > >
>>>>    >>  > >
>>>>    >>  > > --
>>>>    >>  > > David Blevins
>>>>    >>  > > http://twitter.com/dblevins
>>>>    >>  > > http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>    >>  > >
>>>>    >>  > > On May 23, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Mark Struberg
>>>>    > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>    >>  > >
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing 
> 
>>  Apache
>>>>    > OpenWebBeans-1.2.5 .
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > > This is a maintenance release of the 
>>  owb_1.2.x 
>>>   branch and
>>>>    > targets the
>>>>    >>  > > CDI-1.0 specification.
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > > The ReleaseNotes are available online:
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > >
>>>>    >>  >
>>>>    >>
>>>>    >
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310844&version=12326814
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > > Maven staging repo:
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > >
>>>>    >>  >
>>>>    >>
>>>>    >
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > > SVN source tag:
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  
>>>   https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.5/
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > > Source Release:
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > >
>>>>    >>  >
>>>>    >>
>>>>    >
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.2.5/openwebbeans-1.2.5-source-release.zip
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > > Binary release:
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > >
>>>>    >>  >
>>>>    >>
>>>>    >
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.2.5/openwebbeans-distribution-1.2.5-binary.zip
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > > PGP release key 2FDB81B1
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > > 
>>>   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > > The VOTE will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>    >>  > > > [ ] +1 approve
>>>>    >>  > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>    >>  > > > [ ] -1 veto (and reason why)
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > > Here is my +1
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > >
>>>>    >>  > > > LieGrue,
>>>>    >>  > > > strub
>>>>    >>  > >
>>>>    >>  > >
>>>>    >>  >
>>>>    >>
>>>>    >
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>

Reply via email to