[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16884360#comment-16884360
]
Greg Wilkins commented on OWB-1293:
-----------------------------------
Romain et al,
I think we too are leaning towards the attribute method favoured by weld. It
has less reflection in it (and can be made to work with zero reflection if we
just expose the Decorator class). It will also work for non CDI projects that
also may wish to install a Decorator.
So are you totally opposed to that approach, or just prefer the other?
I guess we could support both methods.... but we'd rather not.
> Update Jetty integration prior to Jetty-10 release
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OWB-1293
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1293
> Project: OpenWebBeans
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Interceptor and Decorators
> Reporter: Greg Wilkins
> Priority: Major
>
> The current jetty integration relies on exposing private jetty APIs so a
> jetty Decorator can be registered. This is fragile and requires different
> APIs for the upcoming jetty-10 release.
> Instead, Jetty is developing a mechanism where a object with a decorator
> signature can be set as a context attribute and it will be introspected and
> dynamically registered as a decorator without any API dependencies.
> This is currently being developed in
> [https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/pull/3838] and an integration with
> Weld is at [https://github.com/weld/core/pull/1926]
> Feedback is sought from the OpenWebBeans team on the approach and then we'd
> like to collaborate to make a similar integration.
>
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
